Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.210.47; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pz0-f47.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201112040922.13744.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAJNQ0ssW4od3tA5vdASEs4KxZ7-UsxEjWT7NSc0dcWEzrkcH9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<201112040922.13744.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 16:31:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJB197G+NaRgxG0VbUdbLS=SdoYjdmtaApQiALvn=+n73g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5215653b32c9104b345e319
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Closing issues on github
Precedence: list

--bcaec5215653b32c9104b345e319
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
>
> I think it would be ideal if someone wanted to take up wxBitcoin. Maybe
> after
> backporting to wx 2.8...
>

Indeed, someone could do this if they're interested in it, in their own
fork. That's what I said too. But it's no longer our issue.


> > I don't think that has very high priority, and should probably not be in
> the
> > main project.
>
> Please be careful to avoid the centralization mindset. There is no "main
> project"; there is bitcoind, wxBitcoin, Bitcoin-Qt, MultiBit,


With the "main project" here I mean the issue list of bitcoin/bitcoin
project on github, which only deals with that project (and not that of the
forks, which have their own issue lists). You can argue the "main"-ness but
it's just a mailing list message and not some official document deciding
about the future of bitcoin, so I did not feel like specifying it to that
level of detail.

JS

--bcaec5215653b32c9104b345e319
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br>
I think it would be ideal if someone wanted to take up wxBitcoin. Maybe aft=
er<br>
backporting to wx 2.8...<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Indeed, someon=
e could do this if they&#39;re interested in it, in their own fork. That=
9;s what I said too. But it&#39;s no longer our issue.</div><div>=C2=A0</di=
v>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
&gt; I don&#39;t think that has very high priority, and should probably not=
 be in the<br>
&gt; main project.<br>
<br>
Please be careful to avoid the centralization mindset. There is no &quot;ma=
in<br>
project&quot;; there is bitcoind, wxBitcoin, Bitcoin-Qt, MultiBit,</blockqu=
ote><div><br></div><div>With the &quot;main project&quot; here I mean the i=
ssue list of bitcoin/bitcoin project on github, which only deals with that =
project (and not that of the forks, which have their own issue lists).=C2=
=A0You can argue the &quot;main&quot;-ness but it&#39;s just a mailing list=
 message and not some official document deciding about the future of bitcoi=
n, so I did not feel like specifying it to that level of detail.=C2=A0</div=
>
<div><br></div><div>JS</div><div><br></div></div>

--bcaec5215653b32c9104b345e319--