Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RaQ2e-0003CQ-IC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:57:00 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.47; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-pz0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1RaQ2d-0004Bj-IW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:57:00 +0000 Received: by dake40 with SMTP id e40so8097563dak.34 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:56:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.191.103 with SMTP id gx7mr21475188pbc.126.1323773812220; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.161.12 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:56:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201112061610.41083.luke@dashjr.org> <201112101316.31666.luke@dashjr.org> <20111212205559.GA16665@ulyssis.org> <201112121602.12806.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:56:52 +0100 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c38ad724c504b3f71b95 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT Fill in a short form with personal information -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RaQ2d-0004Bj-IW Cc: Pieter Wuille , bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bytes "2.0" X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:57:00 -0000 --e89a8ff1c38ad724c504b3f71b95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 All, I fully agree with Mike Hearn on this. Like email addresses, bank numbers, phone numbers, IPv4/v6 addresses and such the bitcoin address is just an opaque identifier for machines to be able to send each other messages. Base58 was chosen not for human readability but to make it easy to copy/paste. Of course, sometimes for security reasons you may want to check the addresses manually, but it is not the prime usage scenario. Although fun as a nerd pasttime, I don't think we should encourage "addresses with meaning" to normal users. Indeed better to focus on alternative ways that don't involve typing or even seeing the addresses. Copy/paste of HTML content is currently not possible. You *can* already drag&drop the bitcoin: link to the client. Bluematt has a pull request to automatically handle bitcoin: URLs when clicked in the browser. Wladimir On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: > Why does anyone care what an address looks like? > > If the user is seeing an address, that's a usability fail right there. > It's common today because AFAIK nobody finished off the URL handling > support in the main client for browser integration. It'd be a much better > use of time to finish off that integration and make it easy for people to > create links containing a bitcoin: URL (like with copy/paste of text/html > content). > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Systems Optimization Self Assessment > Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and > improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization > Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > --e89a8ff1c38ad724c504b3f71b95 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All,

I fully agree with Mike Hearn on this. Like e= mail addresses, bank numbers, phone numbers, IPv4/v6 addresses and such=C2= =A0the bitcoin address is just an opaque identifier for machines to be able= to send each other messages.

Base58 was chosen not for human readability but to make= it easy to copy/paste.

Of course, sometimes= for security reasons you may want to check the addresses manually, but it = is not the prime usage scenario. Although fun as a nerd pasttime, I don'= ;t think we should encourage "addresses with meaning" to normal u= sers.

Indeed better to focus on alternative ways that don'= ;t involve typing or even seeing the addresses.

Co= py/paste of HTML content is currently not possible. You *can* already drag&= amp;drop the bitcoin: link to the client. Bluematt has a pull request to au= tomatically handle bitcoin: URLs when clicked in the browser.

Wladimir

On Tue,= Dec 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
Why does anyone care what an address looks like?

If the user is seei= ng an address, that's a usability fail right there. It's common tod= ay because AFAIK nobody finished off the =C2=A0URL handling support in the = main client for browser integration. It'd be a much better use of time = to finish off that integration and make it easy for people to create links = containing a bitcoin: URL (like with copy/paste of text/html content).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------
Systems Optimization Self Assessment
Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and
improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment


--e89a8ff1c38ad724c504b3f71b95--