Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com>) id 1WVN7Y-0006XN-Sf
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:30:32 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.220.180;
	envelope-from=kevinsisco61784@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vc0-f180.google.com; 
Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WVN7Y-0003To-1Y
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:30:32 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id lf12so546037vcb.11
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.52.243.225 with SMTP id xb1mr100699vdc.97.1396452626442;
	Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.115] (ool-457b2cb7.dyn.optonline.net.
	[69.123.44.183])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id iu10sm5892634vdb.4.2014.04.02.08.30.24
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <533C2D04.4090900@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:30:12 -0400
From: Kevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo@heliacal.net>, 
	bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <533B1AF4.5010201@gmail.com>
	<CAJHLa0OKWZEYh8BjADWukx_gAY9SDX7krW5q97PRkog-Ao+B3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<533C2476.20602@gmail.com>
	<516CFEDA-5FF8-4367-824A-BDAF5D64E5DA@heliacal.net>
In-Reply-To: <516CFEDA-5FF8-4367-824A-BDAF5D64E5DA@heliacal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(kevinsisco61784[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
	digit (kevinsisco61784[at]gmail.com)
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WVN7Y-0003To-1Y
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:30:33 -0000

On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
> Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively?  I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special?
>
> On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> At first, this is a poor choice of URL.
>>>
>>> But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I've sat on this for some time after starting this.  I have forked this
>>>> from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax "mode" for bitcoin.  It
>>>> is written in Autoit.  I know I know, scripting language alert!  I would
>>>> like people to look at:
>>>> http://www.githubb.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
>>>> Look at it, and let's have an open dialog about it.  I want to know the
>>>> good, the bad, and the ugly!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kevin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>
>> As far as choice of U R L, it may be a poor choice but I did this
>> because I wanted it connected with the core.  As far as fishing it
>> certainly is not that!  This is a serious project.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
I tell you that this is a serious project for bitcoin.  You are free to 
assume the worst.  After all, I did say the good the bad and the ugly 
would come out of this.  I happen to be a big believer in bitcoin and I 
feel this project holds water.  If you disagree, that's fine.


-- 
Kevin