MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150831094939.63DB4200EF@smtp.hushmail.com>
References: <20150831084538.399E0200EF@smtp.hushmail.com>
	<14f831c53d6-1c38-7667@webprd-a12.mail.aol.com>
	<CADJgMztLxN2ET-gs3jaqGgHGSjggVV5cBWsKP2nGwt-xZ=GQxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150831094939.63DB4200EF@smtp.hushmail.com>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:25:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMztjheTRyXoPiWXpMXpR7ku2cuM-+DHsrrGCiWxauDiCDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship
Precedence: list

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:49 AM, NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com> wrote:
>>While this topic is very interesting, I do not see how it is
>>relevant to a mailing list dedicated to technical and academic debate.
>>Please can you take this discussion elsewhere.
>
> Wow. I have Deja Vu. Where have I heard recently that discussing Bitcoin split is off topic and must be stopped?.. Hm...
>
> This is the biggest issue with Bitcoin right now and you want us to move to some obscure place?
>
> Where? Reddit?  Where we can't be heard? Create another list with top XT people then.

This is a technical list dedicated to technical discussions revolving
around the bitcoin protocol and related technologies. What I am saying
is your discussion topic is not relevant to the long established theme
of this list. Please have a bit of decorum and respect for people who
joined this list so they could participate in and review
technical/academic topics.

Clearly there *should* be a general bitcoin discussion list somewhere,
I don't disagree (and I have repeatedly asked for one to be created),
but regardless, this list isn't it. The flood of off topic and
non-technical posts make it almost impossible to follow any technical
proposals.