Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A565774 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com [209.85.220.45]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDDCE8 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacgr6 with SMTP id gr6so105461568pac.2 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=RZtsQOb4adRXGNxeTbWqcP64qm8ZmhrsHSQHsFkE8fw=; b=iefST+8uVeowIfF6EURVG9m8ZvLzglvgZ7FMqJFXOrLELNJpsCOMBZGjDzzzO060LG OUfsGgRh44uf7It08trtb3DaELwXM8S3hi05D+gAx+1nULn1WzsSuTTgojGCPll7Ict0 gKIsbVtg9nw+Ns/L6WGD6w8XrgZBNYtlB7IzOMdtM43E3QY/f37z7XJyjoVpHWRaaLnu +61PwwtWlEyVbFz3hz4EiY5PWQPhp8Dg9ugsPQyUGCKXK0yJvmA6OQcrTlAFqR9XRs6s Y0IKLJzkSRc4/jNFRyp9mM7y3gDdqEGZJWkkOioAHeqLF/inZQnLQwdQhm09GffNI33U 009w== X-Received: by 10.66.253.229 with SMTP id ad5mr1085278pad.101.1439805561177; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.45.134.112] (c-67-188-9-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.188.9.126]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id pf10sm14164862pac.43.2015.08.17.02.59.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55D1B077.6070208@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:19 -0700 From: Patrick Strateman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030605060509050902020905" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:22 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030605060509050902020905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nobody is going to click that... On 08/17/2015 02:44 AM, Upal Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I have tried to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the > previous block size calculation. > > Requesting for comment - http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev --------------030605060509050902020905 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Nobody is going to click that...

On 08/17/2015 02:44 AM, Upal Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev wrote:

I have tried to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the previous block size calculation.

Requesting for comment - http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

--------------030605060509050902020905--