Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:19:28 +0000
To: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <wOCt6DJ8N_0A9iJ43wTFj_4bR7DorXrB6cIGPsPBr6G_qNDP6veoDOVXnu_9wiKT2prQtbcLApzos7dSBXsaU--bv88m4xLXC8PVwpgRIvQ=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <93d634e2-4102-78f6-c5bc-48fd2af10666@peersm.com>
References: <CAFBxzAAO1u=C8wpwvRs5evE657V0NdnSE9PYAbanpJt5ZdSkdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3504919A-6D19-4858-B00C-9C0FEB090DB5@voskuil.org>
 <PS2P216MB09147F068F81F31593E06A5F9D6D9@PS2P216MB0914.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <93d634e2-4102-78f6-c5bc-48fd2af10666@peersm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
Precedence: list


> It's incredible how this troll keeps trolling and the list (bitcoin-dev !=
!) keeping attention
>
> Good troll, really

Depending on topic raised, it may be useful to at least answer the troll na=
ively as if it were an honest question, if only so that third parties readi=
ng do not get confused and think the troll is bringing up some objection th=
at is actually relevant.

For this particular topic you replied to, it seems to me obviously inane to=
 discuss the "lordship" and "majesty" of the troll.
Even if the claims to such "lordship" are *true*, for most of the world, th=
e relevance of the previous British empire is little more than a reality TV=
 show about the British royal family (oh, some random thing happened to som=
e random descendant of the royal family, how interesting, say did you see t=
hat nice new (actually old) technique Jeremy was talking about on the other=
 thread about delegating control of coins to script, it looks like "graftro=
ot without a softfork"?), and any particular claims to nobility or aristocr=
acy are largely moot, thus not worth answering.


Regards,
ZmnSCPxj