Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qoa8b-0002GW-EO for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:01:25 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-vx0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Qoa8a-0000GT-DT for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:01:25 +0000 Received: by vxh2 with SMTP id 2so811397vxh.34 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:01:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.116.67 with SMTP id ju3mr5581251vdb.63.1312372851235; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.158.233 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 05:00:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1312371499.2322.14.camel@Desktop666> References: <1312371499.2322.14.camel@Desktop666> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:00:51 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SbJiHfINKvBcrqQwRFrHxoudDx0 Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Matt Corallo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548aa599c5b1d04a9989d51 X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.7 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: bluematt.me] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1Qoa8a-0000GT-DT Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds returning gone peers X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:01:25 -0000 --bcaec548aa599c5b1d04a9989d51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yeah, the limited number of slots doesn't help either. I wonder if the current settings are too conservative. Your seed returns quite a few IPs that don't respond to ICMP pings - not sure what is happening there. 03:01:53 scott:~$ for ip in `dig +short dnsseed.bluematt.me`; do echo -n -e "Testing $ip: "; ping -c 1 $ip|grep 'packet loss'; done Testing 24.7.158.162: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms *Testing 50.19.225.254: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 67.242.10.199: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 72.223.56.138: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 76.92.171.255: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 76.123.10.117: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 80.3.173.28: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms *Testing 80.101.109.52: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 93.186.32.117: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms *Testing 94.19.17.167: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms *Testing 97.86.39.50: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 113.255.177.241: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 118.208.226.66: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 173.180.141.86: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms *Testing 174.119.14.66: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms *Testing 178.18.129.133: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms *Testing 193.86.163.77: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 206.255.99.164: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 216.8.180.85: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms Testing 24.1.117.3: 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms* --bcaec548aa599c5b1d04a9989d51 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, the limited number of slots doesn't help either. I wonder if the = current settings are too conservative.

Your seed returns quite a fe= w IPs that don't respond to ICMP pings - not sure what is happening the= re.

03:01:53 scott:~$ for ip in `dig +short dnsseed.bluematt.me`; do echo -n -e "Testing $ip: =C2=A0 &= quot;; ping -c 1 $ip|grep 'packet loss'; done
Testing 24.7.158.162: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted, 1 rec= eived, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 50.19.225.254: =C2=A0 1 pac= kets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 67.242.10.199: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted, = 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 72.223.56.138: =C2=A0 1 packet= s transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 76.92.171.255: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted, 0 r= eceived, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 76.123.10.117: =C2=A0 1 packet= s transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 80.3.173.28: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted, 0 recei= ved, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 80.101.109.52: =C2=A0 1 pa= ckets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 93.186.32.117: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted, = 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 94.19.17.167: =C2=A0 1 packe= ts transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 97.86.39.50: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted, 1 = received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 113.255.177.241: =C2=A0 1 pa= ckets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 118.208.226.66: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted= , 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 173.180.141.86: =C2=A0 1 pack= ets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 174.119.14.66: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted, = 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 178.18.129.133: =C2=A0 1 = packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 193.86.163.77: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitt= ed, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 206.255.99.164: =C2=A0 1 pack= ets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 216.8.180.85: =C2=A0 1 packets transmitted, 0 = received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
Testing 24.1.117.3: =C2=A0 1 packets tran= smitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
--bcaec548aa599c5b1d04a9989d51--