summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorfennwiki <fennwiki@web>2025-03-04 21:20:58 -0800
committerIkiWiki <ikiwiki.info>2025-03-04 21:20:58 -0800
commitb613b79ede0e1a55c3ea1ca5d4c94a4e0c19769f (patch)
tree0b2b6d8252fc4eb524dcb8926806d8165e92ee2b
parentad225446a9f78c461cebb2ba02734dc913896357 (diff)
downloaddiyhpluswiki-master.tar.gz
diyhpluswiki-master.zip
link to berkeleygenomics.org methods for strong germline engineeringHEADmaster
-rw-r--r--gene-editing.mdwn4
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gene-editing.mdwn b/gene-editing.mdwn
index 1540dc6..78c0981 100644
--- a/gene-editing.mdwn
+++ b/gene-editing.mdwn
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ Various DNA editing and genome editing techniques
---
+[berkeleygenomics.org primer on methods of germline engineering](https://berkeleygenomics.org/articles/Methods_for_strong_human_germline_engineering.html): statistics of chromosome selection, number of polygenic gene edits/iterations required for a desired IQ increase
+
+---
+
"Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage" <http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4873371/>
"Here we report the development of base editing, a new approach to genome editing that enables the direct, irreversible conversion of one target DNA base into another in a programmable manner, without requiring dsDNA backbone cleavage or a donor template. We engineered fusions of CRISPR/Cas9 and a cytidine deaminase enzyme that retain the ability to be programmed with a guide RNA, do not induce dsDNA breaks, and mediate the direct conversion of cytidine to uridine, thereby effecting a C→T (or G→A) substitution. The resulting “base editors” convert cytidines within a window of approximately five nucleotides (nt), and can efficiently correct a variety of point mutations relevant to human disease. In four transformed human and murine cell lines, second- and third-generation base editors that fuse uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), and that use a Cas9 nickase targeting the non-edited strand, manipulate the cellular DNA repair response to favor desired base-editing outcomes, resulting in permanent correction of ~15-75% of total cellular DNA with minimal (typically ≤ 1%) indel formation. Base editing expands the scope and efficiency of genome editing of point mutations."